Legal Opinion
Gaita v. Windsor Bank
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1929PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
The plaintiff was a depositor in the defendant bank. He drew and delivered to the payee a check on his account. The next morning, before the check had been presented for payment, he executed and delivered to the teller of the defendant bank a “ stop payment notice,” which reads: “■ Please stop payment on Check No. 220 for $500.00 dated July 1st, drawn by me to the order of Philip Bernstein atty. for E. Schneider & Son Garage Corp. and I hereby agree to indemnify The Windsor Bank against any loss resulting from nonpayment of said check, Should you pay this check through inadvertency, or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Florence Mining Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Tremont Trust Co. v. BurackMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- American Defense Society, Inc. v. Sherman National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Usher v. A. S. Tucker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Isler v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by36 opinions
- Uribe v. MERCHS. BANK OF NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hodnick v. Fidelity Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Aiple v. South Side National Bank in St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Speroff v. First-Central Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
- Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York v. BattatNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.