Legal Opinion

Laux v. Woodworth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1938No. 27109. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

In the complaint in this case there are two causes of action, separately stated. A demurrer was interposed to each, and was overruled as to the first and sustained as to the second. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover on the first cause of action. From the judgment entered in her favor in the sum of $144.79, and interest, she appeals.

No statement of facts or bill of exceptions has been brought to this court. The case is here upon the findings alone. These will be briefly summarized.

Ge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Priest v. DodsworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bowman v. John DoeWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Halvorsen v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Feldesman v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Better Homes, Inc. v. RodgersDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API