Legal Opinion
O'BRIEN v. Eubanks
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 27, 1984No. 83CA1172PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STERNBERG, Judge.
The defendants, William Eubanks individually, and Kemco Industries, Inc., a Texas Corp. of which Eubanks is president, appeal from the trial court’s entry of default judgment against them, and its denial of their motions to vacate that judgment. Each defendant contends that the judgment should be vacated because the court lacked personal jurisdiction, and because the case should have been dismissed under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. We affirm as to defendant Eubanks, individually, and reverse as to Kemco.
The plaintiffs filed an action in Colorado against defendants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Van Schaack & Co. v. District Court, Eighteenth JDSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Ruggieri v. General Well Service, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Weaver Construction Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stone's Farm Supply, Inc. v. DeaconSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Hansen v. PingenotColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- Nutri-West v. GibsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Audio-Visual Systems, Inc. v. HopperColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.