Nutri-West v. Gibson
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Chief Justice.
This case concerns the validity of the so-called “transient jurisdiction” doctrine, which provides that personal service upon a nonresident individual who is temporarily present in a state is a sufficient basis for the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the individual. We conclude that the transient rule is still valid, and we reverse the district court’s order dismissing appellant’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Addressing a related issue, we hold that the district court acquired personal jurisdiction over appellees’ partnership by personal service…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oxmans' Erwin Meat Co. v. BlacketerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Driver v. HelmsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wyoming National Bank of Gillette v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Waterworks Industries, Inc. v. Aplex Industries, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990