Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Pingenot
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1987No. 85CA0778PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZGER, Judge.
Defendant, Ron Pingenot, d/b/a Tejón Gallery, appeals the trial court’s order denying his motions to dismiss, set aside, or stay a default judgment which plaintiff, Gary G. Hansen, seeks to enforce under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (the Act). We reverse and remand for the trial court to enter an order dismissing the action.
On August 21, 1984, a default judgment was entered against Pingenot, a resident of Colorado, in favor of Hansen, a resident of Missouri, by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, Missouri, in the amount of $5,142, plus pre-judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Tucker v. Vista Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Hunter Technology, Inc. v. ScottColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marworth, Inc. v. McGuireSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Independent Bank v. PandyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Legum v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- v. AuneColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Marworth, Inc. v. McGuireColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.