Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Reading

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1922No. Appeal, No. 268PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Kephart,

Appellants sued to recover for loss under a policy insuring a building on land leased from the D., L. & W. R. R. Co. Judgment n. o. v. was entered for defendant, hence this appeal. The insurance contract contained the usual statements, — it should be void if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership, or if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple; no officer, agent or representative shall have power to waive any provision or condition of the policy. Plaintiffs aver in their statement…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891
  2. Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Kister v. Lebanon Mutual Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1889
  4. Ruth-Hastings Glass Tube Co. v. SlatterySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Caldwell v. Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Evans v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Simons v. Safety Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Kuhns v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Youngblood v. Prud. Ins. Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API