Legal Opinion

Rios v. Frauenheim

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 28, 2021No. 5:15-cv-01357Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ULYSSES ALEXANDER RIOS, 11 Case No. 15-01357 BLF (PR) Petitioner, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. STAY; DEEMING MATTER 13 SUBMITTED 14 SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 (Docket No. 56) 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a writ of habeas corpus pursuant 19 to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state conviction out of Santa Clara County. 20 Respondent filed an answer on June 15, 2020. Dkt. No. 44. Since then, Petitioner has 21 been granted four generous extensions of time to file a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Haring v. ProsiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API