Legal Opinion

Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 2004No. 03-35081, 03-35092PublishedCited by 521 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

This case requires us to interpret and apply the standard of review mandated by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (1996), and to determine the meaning of the phrase “adjudicated on the merits,” which acts as a prerequisite to AEDPA review.

In Washington state court, on December 10, 1997, fifteen-year-old Donald Eugene Lambert pled guilty to aggravated first-degree murder, an offense which carries a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. Shortly thereafter, Lambert filed a…

2Cases cited109 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by521 opinions

  1. Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Moses v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Anton E. Barker v. Gary FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Thomas v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Ybarra v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

516 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API