United States v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The United States appeals the district court’s dismissal of Defendant-Appellee Dante Anderson’s indictment for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The court concluded that the defendant’s two predi cate felony convictions were insufficient to support a federal indictment because each resulted from a plea of nolo contendere in a California state court and, therefore, did not conclusively establish Anderson’s guilt.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) prohibits possession of a firearm by “any person ... who has been convicted in any court of, a crime…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Nathan ValerioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- People v. WhitfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
4Cited by6 opinions
- Eddy Ortiz v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Isadore Christopher Diaz v. Edward BorlaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Isadore Christopher Diaz v. Edward BorlaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Johnathan R. Bordelon v. Sircoya M. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Rios v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.