Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 16, 2010No. 09-50559PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The United States appeals the district court’s dismissal of Defendant-Appellee Dante Anderson’s indictment for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The court concluded that the defendant’s two predi cate felony convictions were insufficient to support a federal indictment because each resulted from a plea of nolo contendere in a California state court and, therefore, did not conclusively establish Anderson’s guilt.

Title 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) prohibits possession of a firearm by “any person ... who has been convicted in any court of, a crime…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Nathan ValerioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. People v. WhitfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eddy Ortiz v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Isadore Christopher Diaz v. Edward BorlaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
  3. Isadore Christopher Diaz v. Edward BorlaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
  4. Johnathan R. Bordelon v. Sircoya M. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. Rios v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API