Legal Opinion

Saask v. Yandell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1985No. S-403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case concerns a question of standing under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), AS 25.25.-010-.270. The appellant, Eric Saask, is the stepfather of the child whose support is at issue. Saask did not acquire “legal custody” through the courts. Rather, he became the child’s de facto custodian when his wife, the child’s natural mother, left the child in Saask’s care after she and Saask were divorced in California. Saask has filed a URESA action to recover support arrearages from the child’s natural father, Jack Yandell, Sr., a resident of Alaska.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johansen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Baggs v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Blois v. BloisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Watson v. DreadinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Susan Labram Bart Labram v. James HavelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. State, Child Support Enforcement Division v. GammonsAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. McMullen v. MuirOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. HarnoisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API