Legal Opinion

Baggs v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1974No. 13422PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff Karen Diane Anderson (now Baggs) appeals from a determination by the district court that she is estopped from enforcing collection of "certain payments for child support under a divorce decree.

The foundation of this action is a divorce decree entered in Natrona County, Wyoming, on June 24, 1970, in which plaintiff was awarded custody of three minor children and $200 per month for their support. Defendant made payments through September 1971. When the October payment was not forthcoming difficulties ensued. The exact nature, details and sequence are in dispute.1 But…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Easton v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Price v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Union Tank Car Company v. Wheat BrothersUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Openshaw v. OpenshawUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  5. French v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Stanton v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Sugarhouse Finance Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Matthews v. MatthewsAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State, Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Parker v. IrizarryUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hunter v. HunterUtah Supreme Court · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API