Legal Opinion

McCarty v. Department of Transportation

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 2008No. E040627PublishedCited by 16 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* *]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

In Hooker v. Department of Transportation (2002) 27 Cal.4th 198 [115 Cal.Rptr.2d 853, 38 P.3d 1081], the California Supreme Court enunciated the “retained control” doctrine—that, as a matter of common law, one who hires an independent contractor may be liable for injuries to an employee of the independent contractor if the hirer not only retained control over safety conditions at the worksite, but also negligently exercised its retained control so as to affirmatively contribute to the employee’s injuries. (Id. at pp. 202, 209-210.) In Hooker, as here, the defendant was the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hooker v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc. v. Happening House VenturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Villarreal v. County of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  3. Benson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Freeny v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Strouse v. Webcor Constr., L.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API