Legal Opinion

State v. Noland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1933PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdavis, J.

Hurst Justice, tbe juror, H. L. Justice bis father, and W. B. Noland tbe defendant, are residents of Haywood County. Tbe State’s evidence tends to show that while tbe criminal action against Davis and bis codefendants was being tried in Asheville, tbe defendant Noland went to tbe borne of H. L. Justice and told him that if be could ascertain bow Hurst Justice stood with respect to tbe trial and if be stood for acquittal, H. L. Justice and tbe defendant could each get $500 for learning bow tbe juror stood and tbe juror himself could get $1,000 “for standing that way”; also that tbe defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . BrodieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. . LytleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. State v. Godwin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Howell v. . SolomonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API