Legal Opinion
Zion v. Sentry Safety Control Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 7, 1958No. Nos. 12373, 12374PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The appeals at bar require us to determine whether the court below properly applied Rule 13(a),1 Fed.R.Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C., relating to compulsory counterclaims. On June 25, 1956, Sentry Safety Control Corporation (Sentry) sued Zion individually at CA No. 20,946 in the court below alleging that he had breached fiduciary duties owed by him to Sentry as counsel and director by causing Blue Ridge Sanitary Corporation (Blue Ridge), a stranger corporation insofar as the record shows, to assign to him 25,000 shares of Sentry’s stock in fraud of Sentry. The complaint prays for an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Dickerson v. Dickersons Overseas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Clarke v. Slate v. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Crosby v. HammerlingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
- Schnader v. SchnaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
3Cited by17 opinions
- Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Scott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- In Re Penn Central Transportation Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Blanchard v. KatzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.