Crosby v. Hammerling
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
On Motions to Take Off Nonsuits.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
With reference to the suit against the General Rubricating Company, it is enough, I think, to say in support of the compulsory nonsuit that the plaintiff brings the action as an individual, whereas the contract which lies at the base of his claim was made with the Crosby Lubricating Company, a partnership of 'which he was a member. On such a contract he cannot sue in his own name, as if he were the legal plaintiff. There are other objections, also, to his right to recover; but I shall not take time to discuss them.
The contract just referred to is equally…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mullen v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Stockwell v. LoecherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zion v. Sentry Safety Control Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Charne v. Essex Chair Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
- McBride v. Davis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1972
- Peter P. Zion and Leonard A. Green, Formerly Co-Partners Trading as Peter P. Zion-Leonard A. Green v. Sentry Safety Control Corporation. Peter P. Zion, David F. Kaliner and Leonard A. Green, Formerly Co-Partners Trading as Zion, Kaliner and Green v. Sentry Safety Control CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958