Legal Opinion
Scott v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 17, 1965No. 64-58PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
Linda Scott, a partnership consisting of three partners— Harold Beeten, Edward Frank, and Sam M. Slosberg — commenced this action on February 15, 1958, to recover an amount allegedly due as an equitable adjustment for additional work it had been required to perform under a supply contract executed in 1951 with the Department of the Army. The trial commissioner’s report indicates that it was stipu*653lated in this proceeding that $9,456 is due and owing from the Government on the contract claim.1 On May 29, 1962, the trustee in bankruptcy of Linda Scott, Inc., the assignee of the assets of Linda…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McElrath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Edward J. Bloom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Klebanow v. New York Produce ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Harold E. Harrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Richard L. Gephart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.