Legal Opinion

Perrigo v. Boehm

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

The plaintiffs, T. W. Perrigo, F. B. Perrigo and Lawrence Perrigo, commenced this proceeding as an action at law to recover damages for alleged fraud and deceit.

In the year 1946, Jed and Vera Wilson, husband and wife, were the owners of a tract of land at Seaside, Oregon, lying easterly of and being partly bounded by the right of way of the Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railroad. On August 1, 1946, they leased a portion of such tract to one Donald Matteson, for a term of ten years. The rent reserved was $100 per year, payable annually in arrear. The boundaries of the whole Wilson tract are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. BristolOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Fleishhacker v. Portland News Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Solon B. Clark, Jr., and Geraldine A. Clark, Husband and Wife, and Related Cases v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Napolski v. ChampneyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. D. M. Development Co. v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Skourtes v. SchaerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Skourtes v. SchaerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API