D. M. Development Co. v. Osburn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendants have filed a petition for review in this case charging several factual misstatements. We have reexamined each of the claimed misstatements. Without detailing them, we conclude that defendant’s objections are without any real substance. When the smoke is cleared away we are still left with an equal split in the evidence and testimony as to whether a settlement ever occurred.
Defendant raises one point that merits discussion, and that is the contention that we erred in remanding the case to circuit court for trial of plaintiffs claim for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Carnation Lumber Co. v. McKenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Roseneau Foods, Inc. v. ColemanMontana Supreme Court · 1962
- Maki Et Ux v. NikulaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Perrigo v. BoehmOregon Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Isbill Associates, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Kohl v. PNC Bank National Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Rahman v. Federal Management Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Kohl v. PNC Bank National Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- JS PROPERTIES, LLC v. Brown & Filson, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.