Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Indopco, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 8, 1994No. 93 C 2973PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court are the motions of defendant Indopco, Inc., d/b/a Unichema North America (“Unichema”) to dismiss plaintiff Carmelita R. Wilkes’ (“Wilkes”) second amended Count III 1 pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and to sever the claims of plaintiff Iona E. Johnson (“Johnson”) and Wilkes pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 21. For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is denied and the motion to sever is granted.
BACKGROUND 2
On October 21, 1993, the court granted Unichema’s motion to dismiss Wilkes’ first amended Count III, violations of the Civil…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Marcia L. Saxton v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Successor to at & T Bell LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Anna M. Juarez v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Floyd v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Renalds v. S.R.G. Restaurant GroupDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Bailey v. Northern Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Marshall v. OK Rental & Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.