Legal Opinion
Davis v. State Board of Optometry
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1939No. Civ. 11875PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DORAN, J. —
In a petition for a writ of mandate filed in the superior court the petitioner, Harry Davis, sought a writ to compel the defendants, the State Board of Optometry of the State of California, and three members thereof, to restore his license which had been revoked as the result of a hearing conducted under the provisions of the Optometry Law (Stats. 1913, chap. 598, as amended; Act 5668 of Deering’s General Laws of California). Issues being joined, the matter was submitted for decision in the superior court upon the pleadings, which contained the complaint and decision of the board,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Black v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Nider v. City CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Cow Hollow Improvement Club v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Delany v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Covina-Azusa Fire Fighters Union, Local 2415 v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.