Los Angeles Soda Works v. Southern California Aquazone Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
Final judgment having been entered pursuant to an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint filed in this action without leave to amend, the plaintiff appealed.
Appellant alleged that on June 2, 1925, it became the sublessee of respondent Southern California Aquazone Company, a corporation, of premises belonging to the respondent F. G. Phillipps, for a term extending until March 1,1927, “and any renewal of the same,” at the rental “specified in said lease”; that it entered and still had possession of the premises, and had performed all of the terms and conditions thereof; that the sublessor…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Howard v. BurrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Copeland v. Baskin Robbins U.S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Ablett v. ClausonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Martin v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.