Legal Opinion
Nahas v. George
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1950No. 31972PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
Prom the foregoing statement of facts it will be noted, as indeed it was stipulated by the parties, that the sole question for determination upon this appeal is whether exclusive, original jurisdiction in this cause was vested in the Probate Court.
The Court of Appeals in its opinion said that Section 8085, General Code, and the related following sections set out a method of procedure whereby a surviving partner winds up the partnership business; that the provisions of these sections are mandatory; and that exclusive'jurisdiction lies in the Probate Court to complete the affairs of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Denver v. RoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- State Ex Rel. Black v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Savage v. DowrieNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Snyder, Admr. v. RoweOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holdeman v. Epperson, Unpublished Decision (7-22-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Vanstone v. VanstoneOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- VanStone v. VanStoneOhio Court of Appeals · 1952