Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Black v. White

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1936No. 26074PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

There is here just one question. If the judge of the Common Pleas Court of Clermont county,-^Ohio, has jurisdiction of the subject-matter of this action for specific performance, then the writ of prohibition should be refused. If such court has no jurisdiction, then the writ as prayed for should be allowed.

Section 11270, General Code, provides in part as follows :

“An action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate may be brought either in the county in which the subject of the action is situated, or where the defendants, or any of them, reside. * * * ”

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. GregoryOhio Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Seventh Urban, Inc. v. University Circle Property Development, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Snavely v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Young v. GuellaOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. City of Seven Hills v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Fellers v. BelauPaulding County Court of Common Pleas · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API