Legal Opinion

AW SCHAFFER v. United States

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 22, 1956No. Civ. 624PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICKELSON, Chief Judge.

This statutory three-judge court action was brought by the plaintiffs to set aside the report and order of the Interstate Commerce Commission pursuant to Sec. 205(g) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 305(g), Sec. 10, of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009 and Secs. 1336, 1398, 2284, 2321 to 2325, of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 1398, 2284 and 2321-2325, inch That report and order was entered by the Commission in Docket No. MC-93529 (Sub. No. 2), A. W. Schaffer Extension- — Granite.

The applicant, A. W. Schaffer, d/b/a Schaffer…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kentucky State Racing Commission v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  2. Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. López Luiggi v. Muñoz MarínSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957
  4. Ace Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1960
  5. Noren v. BeckDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API