Legal Opinion

Noren v. Beck

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 21, 1961No. Civ. 2139PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKER, District Judge.

This is an action wherein plaintiffs seek, under the provisions of Title 5 United States Code Annotated § 1009(e) of the Administrative Procedure Act, a trial de novo concerning various administrative determinations made within the Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, in connection with certain land entries filed by them.

The plaintiffs, among other things, allege in their complaint that the administrative action within the Department of the Interior was “arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory, unlawful, illegal, and a denial of rights accorded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Ickes v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  3. AW SCHAFFER v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1956
  4. In Re CartelloneDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kentucky State Racing Commission v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  2. Alfred Coleman and Edward J. McClennan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Sierra Club v. HardinDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1971
  4. Community National Bank of Pontiac v. SaxonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  5. Borden Company v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API