Legal Opinion

Duty v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 9, 1994No. CA CR 92-1392PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

Appellant, James A. Duty, was found guilty by the circuit court, sitting without a jury, of speeding and driving under a suspended driver’s license, for which he was fined $50.00 and $500.00, respectively, and ordered to pay court costs. Appellant raises several arguments on appeal. We find sufficient merit in one of his points to warrant reversal and remand for a new trial.

We first consider appellant’s argument that he was denied his constitutional right to a jury trial. Arkansas law gives every criminal defendant the right to a jury trial. The right “shall remain…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Calnan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Winkle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Allen v. KizerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Barrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  3. McCoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Schwede v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Reaser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API