Schwede v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Judith Rogers, Judge.
Appellant was found guilty during a bench trial of aggravated assault and sentenced to two years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction and argues that the trial judge erred in not recusing. We affirm.
Appellant first argues that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain his conviction for aggravated assault. The test for determining sufficient proof is whether there is substantial evidence to support the verdict; on appeal, the court reviews the evidence in the light most…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Tigue v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Burrows v. City of ForrestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Wooten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
- Swaim v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Stanley Maina v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
- Marvin Stuart v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
- Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.