Legal Opinion

Sinnig v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1934No. Appeals, 242 and 243PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

These two appeals, one by the husband, the other by his wife, are from a judgment entered for defendant upon the whole record, after disagreement of the jury in an action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries received by the wife, who claims she was struck by a car of defendant company at the corner of Liberty Avenue and Wood Street in the City of Pittsburgh. The sole question for our consideration is whether or not the evidence justified the court below in entering judgment for defendant on the ground that the wife-plaintiff was contributorily negligent.

Liberty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patton v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Barton v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Uhlig v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dando v. BrobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Pessolano v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Watson v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Cinquina v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Resseguie v. Reynolds, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Union County1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API