Legal Opinion

Barton v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1925No. Appeal, 15PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Walling,

The William Penn Highway (herein called the highway) extends from Bethlehem to Easton and is intersected, practically at right angles, by a public road, called Kemmerer Street. The Lehigh Valley Transit Company, defendant, has a single-track electric street railway located on private property to the north of and adjoining the highway and crossing Kemmerer Street a few feet therefrom. Mrs. Laura Barton, the plaintiff, lived on Kemmerer Street and, while returning from Bethlehem on July 12, 1922, drove her Ford sedan east along the highway until she turned north…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Holden v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Knobeloch v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Hill v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Marland v. Pittsb. & L. E. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dando v. BrobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Riley v. McNaugherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Hisak v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Pessolano v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Patton v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API