Cinquina v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion bt
Me. Justice Patterson:
It has long been the settled law of this Commonwealth that a pedestrian has an absolute duty to look for approaching trolley cars immediately before entering upon tlie car tracks and that failure to do so constitutes contributory negligence as a matter of law: Watson v. P. T. C., 356 Pa. 103, 106, 51 A. 2d 613. The fact that a pedestrian is proceeding under a favorable traffic signal does not relieve him of this duty. A green light at a traffic intersection offers but a qualified permission to proceed, and the pedestrian crossing in reliance upon it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dando v. BrobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Flynn v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Patton v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Cunningham v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Weldon v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.