Legal Opinion

Uhlig v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1926No. Appeal, 218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued to recover damages for injuries received by the wife, — who, hereafter in this opinion^ will be referred to as the plaintiff. The court below directed a verdict for defendant, on the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence; judgment was entered accordingly; hence this appeal.

The accident occurred at night, as plaintiff was walking across'Allegheny Avenue, near its intersection with Sixth Street, Philadelphia, and it happened thus: One of defendant’s cars had turned from Sixth Street, into Allegheny Avenue, coming from the rear of plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Crooks v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sinnig v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Turner v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Ewanco v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API