Uhlig v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued to recover damages for injuries received by the wife, — who, hereafter in this opinion^ will be referred to as the plaintiff. The court below directed a verdict for defendant, on the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence; judgment was entered accordingly; hence this appeal.
The accident occurred at night, as plaintiff was walking across'Allegheny Avenue, near its intersection with Sixth Street, Philadelphia, and it happened thus: One of defendant’s cars had turned from Sixth Street, into Allegheny Avenue, coming from the rear of plaintiff…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cunningham v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Crooks v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sinnig v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Turner v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Ewanco v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947