Legal Opinion

Innis, Speiden & Co. v. Food Machinery Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 1, 1943No. 1288PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for the infringement of United States Patent No. 1,943,468, granted to Walter A. Bridgeman and John Alan Schade on January 16, 1934, for a “Wax Emulsion Coating, and Coating Process”. Innis, Speiden & Company is the owner of the patent and Franklin Research Company is an exclusive licensee under an agreement dated April 2, 1937. The intervener, Brogdex Company of California, Ltd., was permitted to come into the suit by reason of certain rights growing out of an agreement dated January 3, 1938. The reasons for the allowance of this intervention are stated in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Innis, Speiden & Co. v. Food Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1942
  3. Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Booth Fisheries Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Application of De VaneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Smith v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Smith v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API