Application of De Vaney
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of all the claims—three in number—embraced in appellant’s application for patent relating to alleged improvements in the beneficiation of silicious iron-bearing minerals by cationic froth flotation processes. It is understood that by “beneficiation” as used in mineral art concentration of the ore is meant.
The claims read:
“6.‘ Process of concentrating the oxidic iron content of an aqueous pulp of a silicious, essentially…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- In re MerkleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- In re DavisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- In re HerthelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Application of Paul H. AldrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of PappasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of MalcolmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.