Legal Opinion

Booth Fisheries Corp. v. General Foods Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 8, 1942No. 1267PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The complaint states two causes of action. The plaintiff seeks an accounting and an injunction for the alleged infringement by the defendants 1 2of certain claims of the Cooke Patent No. 1,614,455. The complaint also prays for a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff is free of any liability for alleged infringement of any of the claims of four of the defendants’ patents : viz., Birdseye No. 1,773,079, Birdseye No. 1,773,081, Barry No. 1,822,121, and Birdseye and Hall No. 1,822,123 2 The defendants have filed a counterclaim alleging the infringement by the plaintiff of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. E. L. Bruce Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shell Development Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
  3. Kennametal, Inc. v. American Cutting Alloys, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
  4. F. E. Myers & Bros. v. Goulds Pumps, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947
  5. Innis, Speiden & Co. v. Food Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API