Legal Opinion

Thurston v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1965No. 39383PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action, petitioner alleges that he is entitled to release because there was an unnecessary delay between the time of arrest and the time of being taken before a magistrate, that his codefendants were pressured into making confessions which were used at the trial, and that he was denied his right to counsel.

Petitioner’s argument in relation to denial of counsel arises from the following facts: Shortly after his arrest and prior to preliminary hearing, counsel was retained by petitioner. Such counsel waived preliminary hearing, and petitioner was bound over and indicted by the grand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. RosenOhio Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. BlankenshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. DownsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Samuel King v. David Bobby, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. LockettOhio Supreme Court · 1976

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API