Legal Opinion
State v. Downs
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1977No. 77-75PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, C. J.
Appellant presents five propositions of law.
I
In his first proposition of law, the defendant attacks the constitutionality of Ohio’s capital sentencing procedure, as follows:
“Section 2929.04(B) of the Ohio Revised Code, requiring a defendant convicted of aggravated murder to prove certain mitigating, circumstances by a preponderance of the evidence in order to be sentenced to life imprisonment, rather than to death, violates the due process requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and Article one, Section sixteen of the Ohio Constitution; the prosecution must…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. Kirkland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. RicheyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Ohio v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.