Legal Opinion
Maloney v. T3Media, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 6, 2015No. CV 14-05048-AB (VBKx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order Granting Defendant’s Special Motion to Strike Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 36)
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., Judge.
Carla Badirian, Deputy Clerk.
Pending before the Court is Defendant T3Media, Inc.’s Special Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) under California’s Anti-SLAPP Statute (Cal.Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16), filed on October 24, 2014. (Mot., Dkt. No. 36.) Plaintiffs Maloney and Judge, acting on behalf of the putative class, filed an Opposition on November 17, 2014 and Defendant filed a Reply on November 17, 2014. (Opp., Reply,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Batzel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nunes v. MeredithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022