Matter of Berkowitz
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This attorney disciplinary matter arose from a formal complaint charging two attorneys, partners in a large law firm, with representing two parties with actual or potentially adverse interests. One of the parties was a manufacturing concern whose operations were threatened by a proposed land development sought by the other party.
The case presents the issue whether two attorneys, aware of the different concerns of their respective clients, violated our rules of ethics in failing to recognize and to resolve the possible conflict of interest between the clients. That issue must be addressed in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- In Re NigohosianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- In Re GoldstaubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- In Re KampSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Matter of Opinion No. 653Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elizabeth A. Comando v. Mary F. NugielNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- In Re PenaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- In re FitchettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- In Re SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- In the Matter of William J. Torre(075524)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.