Legal Opinion

Matter of Humen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 1, 1991PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of a presentment filed by the District VI Ethics Committee (DEC) against respondent, Peter Humen, based on his representation of Lillian O’Connell. The DEC found respondent guilty of unethical conduct, and the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) agreed with that finding. A majority of the DRB recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year, two members recommended that he be suspended for two years, and one member voted to recommend disbarment. Our independent review of the record leads us to conclude that respondent has been…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. In Re WolkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. In Re HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Matter of SilvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. In Re GallopSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Radio-Electronics Officers Union District 3Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Alpert, Goldberg v. QuinnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Cohen v. Radio-Electronics OfficersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. Matter of BerkowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Petit-Clair v. NelsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API