Legal Opinion
Glucksman v. FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 6, 2009No. 1:08-mj-00178PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MAUSKOPF, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Abraham and Esther Glucks-man sue Defendants First Franklin Financial Corporation (“First Franklin”) and Fairfield Financial Mortgage Group, Inc. (“Fairfield Financial”) under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (“TILA”), and Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226 (“Regulation Z”), in connection with the Gluck-smans’ refinancing of their mortgage. First Franklin moves to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the reasons below, the motion is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brian Sheppard v. Leon Beerman, as an Individual and in His Official Capacity as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Mckenna v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Century Pacific, Inc. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Iannuzzi v. American Mortgage Network, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Midouin v. Downey Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Garcia v. Fannie MaeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Karakus v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Fair v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025