Legal Opinion
Sanchez v. Lagoudakis
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1998No. 106764, Calendar No. 11PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER REMAND
Boyle, J.
We granted leave in this case to decide whether the Court of Appeals properly determined the parties’ rights under the Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act (hcra)1 and certain provisions of the Public Health Code.2 We hold that the Court of Appeals failed to properly balance the interests underlying the applicable statutes and regulations. We also hold that the Court of Appeals erred in sustaining the trial court’s award of attorney fees.
We emphasize at the outset that the lengths to which we go in limiting this opinion by explaining what it is not about, are made necessary by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Prevo's Family Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Carr v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Ashworth v. Jefferson Screw Products, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peden v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Michalski v. Bar-LevavMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. JensenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Salim v. MGM Grand Detroit, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Petzold v. Borman’s, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.