Michalski v. Bar-Levav

Following a motion for summary disposition brought pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10), plaintiff’s Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act claim was dismissed by the circuit court.1 The Court of Appeals reversed. The issue before this Court is whether the Court of Appeals properly concluded that plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to create a question of fact with respect to whether defendant regarded her as having a determinable physical or mental characteristic that substantially limited one or more of her *726major life activities. We hold that plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence to create such…