Legal Opinion
Sebrone Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 26, 1943No. 8056PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
Two corporate and five individual petitioners seek review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission that they cease and desist from disseminating false advertisements. These advertisements related to two products manufactured by the Sebrone Company, and distributed by it in Cook County, and by the Federal Cosmetic Sales Corporation elsewhere, throughout the United States, under exclusive license from the Sebrone Company. The products were “Waft,” a deodorant, and “Sebrone,” for use in cases of dandruff.
The order was directed to advertisements representing that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Southport Petroleum Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- DDD CORPORATION v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Bockenstette v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by15 opinions
- Standard Distributors, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Maurice J. Feil and Leo a Loeb, Individually and as Co-Partners Trading as the Enurtone Company v. Federal Trande CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Consumer Sales Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Steelco Stainless Steel, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Federal Trade Commission v. Think Achievement Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.