Legal Opinion

Bockenstette v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1943No. 2582PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

By this appeal, petitioners challenge a cease and desist order of the Federal Trade Commission directing them to cease and desist from practices in commerce in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45.

Petitioners own and operate a large hatchery at Sabetha, Kansas. They hatch eggs and sell the baby chicks in many states of the union. They engage intensively in advertising by use of the mails, newspapers, and by other methods usually employed by advertisers. The Commission found as a fact that the following statements and representations made by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Royal Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Brown Fence & Wire Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. State Ex Rel. Bronster v. United States Steel Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Courbat v. Dahana Ranch, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Eastern Star, Inc. v. Union Building Materials Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API