Legal Opinion

Engle v. Mayor of Cumberland

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1942No. [No. 12, January Term, 1942.]PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The only question in this case is the validity of a section of the City Charter of Cumberland, respecting suits for damages against the city “to persons or property arising from or occasioned by any public street, highway, or grounds.”

The plaintiff, appellant, Margaret Engle, brought suit and filed a declaration on July 21, 1941, wherein she charged the city with having placed in the foot pavement in front of No. 400 Walnut Street, a public highway of the city, a watercock, water pipe, water lid, or stop box, “about fifty-six inches inside of the curb line of the pavement, and was negligently…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  2. MacMullen v. . City of MiddletownNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Lipsitz v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Canfield v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Neuenschwander v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Hansen v. City of LaurelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Cannon v. McKenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Davis v. Frostburg Facility Operations, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Lohr v. Upper Potomac River CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API