Legal Opinion

Belles v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1894No. 1454PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

Appellant Miller and William Carroll purchased from respondent certain lands in the city of Puyallup, for the sum of five thousand dollars, paying one *261thousand dollars cash, and executed their note to Peter Belles for $4,000. A mortgage was also executed to Belles by William Carroll, Jane Carroll and appellant Miller upon the land so purchased. The note not having been paid at maturity thereof, on the 3d day of May, 1892, respondent instituted suit upon both note and mortgage against William Carroll, Jane Carroll and appellant Miller.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. US v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Grignon's Lessee v. ASTORSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. Cornett v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. White v. CrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kizer v. CaufieldWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. City of Ballard v. WayWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kalb v. German Savings & Loan SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Wick v. ReaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Second Injury Fund v. LupachinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API