Legal Opinion

Novick/Crew v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2004No. SC S51686 (Control); S51690PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*571DURHAM, J.

The court has consolidated for opinion two petitions for review of a ballot title under ORS 250.085(2). Petitioners Novick and Crew are electors who are dissatisfied with the Attorney General’s certified ballot title. Because petitioners timely submitted written comments regarding the draft ballot title, they are entitled to seek review in this court. ORS 250.085(2). Intervenor Bird has intervened in support of the objections that petitioner Novick filed and in opposition to the objections that petitioner Crew filed.

The proposed measure, if adopted, would amend ORS 20.340 to impose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. McCann / Harmon v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Pelikan v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Greenberg v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Caruthers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API