Legal Opinion

Edenshaw v. Safeway, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2008No. S-12583PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We accepted certification in this case to determine whether actual or constructive notice of a hazardous condition is an element of a prima facie case in an action against a grocery store owner in a slip-and-fall case. We hold that it is not.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The facts presented to us are sparse. Gerald Edenshaw slipped and fell at the Carr's store in Ketchikan on May 10, 2008. He brought a negligence action against Safeway, Inc. and Carr's. After removal to federal court, Safeway moved for summary judgment, alleging (1) that it had fulfilled…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ortega v. Kmart Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Pimentel v. Roundup CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Burnett v. CovellAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc. v. Ingaldson Fitzgerald, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Chitwood v. BaconDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API