Edenshaw v. Safeway, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
We accepted certification in this case to determine whether actual or constructive notice of a hazardous condition is an element of a prima facie case in an action against a grocery store owner in a slip-and-fall case. We hold that it is not.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The facts presented to us are sparse. Gerald Edenshaw slipped and fell at the Carr's store in Ketchikan on May 10, 2008. He brought a negligence action against Safeway, Inc. and Carr's. After removal to federal court, Safeway moved for summary judgment, alleging (1) that it had fulfilled…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Ortega v. Kmart Corp.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Pimentel v. Roundup CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Burnett v. CovellAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc. v. Ingaldson Fitzgerald, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Chitwood v. BaconDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.