Legal Opinion
Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 17, 2010No. AC 31257PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The defendant EAPWJP, LLC (EAP), appeals from the judgment of the trial court recognizing the acquisition of a prescriptive easement over aportion of its property for beach access by the plaintiffs 1 and finding that EAP had failed to prove that the placement and maintenance of mooring poles in the water below the mean high tide line of White Beach in Stonington by several of the plaintiffs was a public nuisance. 2 EAP also appeals from the judgment, which recognized the acquisition of a prescriptive easement over a portion of its property for beach access and an implied…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Beckwith v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burton v. Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Szekeres v. SzekeresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Lane v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010