Legal Opinion
Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLC
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 7, 2010No. SC 18696Published
1Opinion of the Court
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 316 (AC 31257), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that construction and use of a walkway deemed to be a per se public nuisance can establish a prescriptive easement over the underlying tidal wetlands?”
McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Murphy v. EAPWJP, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010